Posts tagged ‘Free Thought’

April 5th, 2008

Two completely different ways of looking at the world

For most of us in the Western world, challenging religion and advocating free thought are reasonably risk-free activities. One has to admire the courage of Syrian poet Adonis, advocating those ideals while delivering the keynote address at the ‘Innovation in Islam’ conference.

“If a religion cannot offer human beings free thinking and freedom, there is no benefit in continuing to be part of it, Syrian poet Adonis said yesterday.

What can emanate from a faith where people are made to believe that everything has been said and no more inquisitiveness or reasoning is required. A society that ceases to think freely is an antipode to existence,” he said.

“Islam today is nothing but similar to Christian theology except with a turban. Muslims can either continue the concept of one Umma (Nation) – which has been failing – or they can join the concept of humanism, that liberates them from the rules of fiqh and allows total equality for all citizens,” remarked Adonis.

“Innovations cannot be made in a religion. Only human intellect makes it possible,” he said, and “that can only come when Muslims start to question and reason again. The religion and politics must be separated.”

“Look at the Arab history, intellectual dealing, religious text, upheavals and all the events until the end of the first half of the Hijri century, during which four Rightly-Guided Caliphs were murdered – one supposedly poisoned. Then Baghdad declines and falls in 1228, gets taken over by Ottomans, followed by another takeover by Western civilisation that continues to be the case until today,” he said.

“During this time, while we should have learned from the age of Renaissance – allowing for more vision and adaptations – we went back to traditions and the result is a current Islamic fundamentalism, that people say lays a siege on human culture. Its like allowing the people to ‘look’ but not ‘join’,” he said.
Adonis, also drew great parallels between religious text and poetry, calling the former “a text that was said once and forever”, while the latter “an innovative process, allowing the poet to present new words and relations between man and the universe”.

“Essence of innovation in poetic terms means to reject the preconceived notions, while essence of innovation in religious terms means not to reject the sacred text. The text can be explained and interpreted but not questioned,” he said.

“The truth in poetry is relative and innovation in it changes with time, whereas religion never changes. That makes religion an answer, while poetry a question – thus the incompatibility. One requires submission, dictation and faith, the other requires reasoning and exploring. Two completely different ways of looking at the world,” he added.

(Source)

February 4th, 2008

Organizing atheists & free thinkers

One of the factors that makes religion attractive and atheism unattractive to many people is that atheism offers no community. Humans are social animals. Churches have long exploited this aspect of our humanity. I would wager that many theists place more value on their church membership than they do on the theological implications of belief.

A problem with trying to organize atheists into a community is that we have a single point of view in common, our disbelief in gods. Other than that, we believe a wide range of concepts that we may or may not share with other atheists. I know atheist UFO fanatics, atheists who follow politics “religiously” and others who barely know who the president is, atheist hunters and atheist animal-rights advocates.

Free thought isn’t a set of beliefs or attitudes, it’s the means by which a thinking human comes to conclusions without being distracted or blinded by preconceived notions. So even free thought doesn’t really offer itself as a rallying point for a group. “We’re free thinkers!” “What do you free think about?” “Uh, everything…”

Free thought groups and atheist groups have been reasonably compared to a herd of cats. I think that’s an accurate assessment.

signature

February 3rd, 2008

Positive or negative?

I been thinking lately.

Should I be satisfied with defining my beliefs in the negative (atheist), or should I make more of an effort to accentuate the positive aspects of my personal philosophy (free thinking)?

I don’t know that either viewpoint should be exclusive. But I am going to try to address my interests from a more positive than negative angle for a while and see what effect it has on my general disposition. Usually I’m a very happy person, I love humor and wit. Theology is such a silly concept, I should find it fairly easy to discuss it with less disdain. Instead, I want to emphasize the positive aspects of a life without religion, a world view free from superstition and mythology, the ability to think for one’s self.

signature