Archive for ‘Politics’

January 31st, 2009

Are we loathsome?

The Beast has published their annual list of the 50 most loathsome people in America. As always it’s extremely funny but thought-provoking as well. I doubt you’ll agree with every entry, I didn’t. But it’s hard to deny their substantiation has merit. Perhaps the most compelling entry is this:

43. You

Charges:You think it’s your patriotic duty to spend money you don’t have on crap you don’t need. You think Hillary lost because of sexism, when it’s actually because she’s just a bad liar. You think Iraq is better off now than before we invaded, and don’t understand why they’re so ungrateful. You think Tim Russert was a great journalist. You’re hopping mad about an auto industry bailout that cost a squirt of piss compared to a Wall Street heist of galactic dimensions, due to a housing crash you somehow have blamed on minorities. It took you six years to figure out what a tool Bush is, but you think Obama will make it all better. You deem it hunky dory that we conduct national policy debates via 8-second clips from “The View.” You think God zapped humans into existence a few thousand years ago, although your appendix and wisdom teeth disagree. You like watching vicious assholes insult each other on TV. You support gun rights, because firing one gives you a chubby. You cuddle falsehoods and resent enlightenment. You think the fact that 43% of whites could stomach voting for an incredibly charismatic and eloquent light-skinned black guy who was raised by white people means racism is over. You think progressive taxation is socialism. 1 in 100 of you are in jail, and you think it should be more. You are shallow, inconsiderate, afraid, brand-conscious, sedentary, and totally self-obsessed. You are American.

It may have been intended as humor, but I’d say it gives all Americans something to consider and not just reject out-of-hand.

December 21st, 2008

Don’t you annoy me

Repeatedly annoying or insulting someone in Brighton could get you fined.

The City Council Thursday passed ordinance amendments aimed at protecting individuals from harassment, intimidation or interference by others in their daily activities.

City Manager Dana Foster stressed that the amended ordinance wasn’t adopted to muzzle anyone or infringe on their rights.

The ordinance makes it a civil infraction for a person to “engage in a course of conduct or repeatedly commit acts that alarm or seriously annoy another person and that serve no legitimate purpose.” It further makes it illegal to “insult, accost, molest or otherwise annoy, either by word of mouth, sign or motion any person in any public place.”

Brighton Police Chief Tom Wightman said violating the ordinance is punishable by fines only. He also said it’s not about a single incident but involves repeated acts. (Source-Ann Arbor News)

annoying

They seriously don’t see this as infringing on a person’s rights? What purpose does an ordinance like this serve except to provide an end-around the 1st Amendment? Does anyone think this will survive its first court challenge?

Who will be the arbiter of what is annoying? What exactly constitutes an interference? Will Jahovah’s Witnesses be fined under this ordinance? How about those who badger me to register to vote outside the grocery store? How will a person substantiate their perceptions in a court of law? Where’s the standard, since what annoys or offends you may have no impact on me?

Will poorly considered ordinances like this be enforced by the thought police?

November 18th, 2008

Free Thought of the Day

Rabbi Sherwin Wine:

There are two visions of America. One precedes our founding fathers and finds its roots in the harshness of our puritan past. It is very suspicious of freedom, uncomfortable with diversity, hostile to science, unfriendly to reason, contemptuous of personal autonomy. It sees America as a religious nation. It views patriotism as allegiance to God. It secretly adores coercion and conformity. Despite our constitution, despite the legacy of the Enlightenment, it appeals to millions of Americans and threatens our freedom.

The other vision finds its roots in the spirit of our founding revolution and in the leaders of this nation who embraced the age of reason. It loves freedom, encourages diversity, embraces science and affirms the dignity and rights of every individual. It sees America as a moral nation, neither completely religious nor completely secular. It defines patriotism as love of country and of the people who make it strong. It defends all citizens against unjust coercion and irrational conformity.

This second vision is our vision. It is the vision of a free society. We must be bold enough to proclaim it and strong enough to defend it against all its enemies.

November 15th, 2008

Child Abuse-Turning Kids into Political Zombies

Free thinkers envy children with their unbiased perception of the world. Training children to become mental zombies, mouthing responses they don’t understand and can’t possibly have arrived at on their own is tantamount to child abuse. People who force their children to act as though they believe in the parent’s politics or religion are doing their kids no favor. In fact, the harm they do may not become evident for many years.

Here’s an example of the political child abuser. Look at the faces of his children. This isn’t a family, it’s a cult.

November 4th, 2008

A reason to hope?

I’m usually critical, skeptical, not easily given to optimism. I know enough about humanity and its history to be fairly confident in my pessimism.

Tonight, however, I’m wondering if this next year might prove my worst expectations false. Perhaps Americans have noticed the damage that’s been done to our country by Bush/Cheney and decided to change direction. Maybe our descent into near-theocracy will reverse course. It’s possible that we will return to older American values; financial security, peace internationally, peace domestically, low unemployment, high productivity, innovation.

If it turns out that proposition 8 in California is passed, I’m saddened but not surprised. Disappointed but not defeated. What is been done can be undone.

The “Yes on 8″ crowd made it abundantly clear that their sole intent was to impose religious belief upon California state law. In the last three weeks their ads have constantly appealed to religious objections to homosexuality generally, but made no effort to provide any substantiation for their non-religious claims. Their only interest has been in spreading fear, uncertainty and doubt. They provided no reason to justify the denial of rights to gays to marry and establish families. These great supporters of family values. They don’t support all family values.

Obama should remind us that progress is possible. It may take longer than we’d like. Progress may bring as much pain as pleasure. That’s life.

If there were enough people in America to elect Obama, there ought to be enough people in California to support gay marriage. I understand that accepting an Obama presidency doesn’t in itself violate Christian sensibilities the way gays do.

The issue’s been raised. This time was too soon, the idea received a knee-jerk reaction fueled by religious intolerance and bigotry. But now more people are going to think about this, and many of them will reconsider the lines they’ve been fed. They’ll start to question theological presumptions that in some mysterious way gay marriage will somehow impact on their lives. The longer they think about their support of 8, the more likely they’ll come to their senses. They’ll realize that to allow does not imply an endorsement.

At some point, I hope soon, Americans will follow Barak’s example on the state level and below.

We’ll see. The times, they are ‘a changin’. New possibilities have been exposed. Conditions exist to breed hope.

Then again, my pessimism may eventually be proven justified and I’ll be calling myself a fool for having any hope at all. Change isn’t always just for the good. Change-for-the-sake-of-change and change-for-the-worse are just as possible.

November 1st, 2008

Facts don’t get in the way of Web political rumors

With just days to go before the election, gossip, hearsay, innuendo and smears are flying through the Internet as gadflies and rumormongers hope to sway voters before they head to the polls.

“It’s a lot of mud being slung, it’s understandable, but I think it’s still kind of sad,” said Nick DiFonzo, a psychologist and rumor expert at Rochester Institute of Technology in upstate New York.

Candidates and their campaigns are circulating negative bits of information in mainstream venues, raising questions about their opponents in speeches and dropping sour hints in their advertisements. But only on the Internet can entirely false rumors persist, stories told without back up, persistently bouncing from one blog to another.

Some have been out there for years, despite repeated rebuttals from the campaigns. Others surfaced only this past week. And they range from the truly silly (Weekly World News Web site: “OCTOBER SURPRISE: ALIEN ENDORSES MCCAIN!”) to the multitude of bloggers who report results even though votes have yet to be counted: (”Has John McCain Won Florida?” asked the Red State Web site Thursday.)

Most voters say they have already made their decisions about who they want to have as their next president. So the Internet rumors are targeted at the shrinking pool of undecided voters who are still waiting, wondering and potentially still gathering information.

Some examples:

The Rumor: The Huffington Post Web site, among others, has reported that John McCain used an obscene word to describe his wife Cindy during his 1992 Senate campaign.

The Facts: This is unsubstantiated. Author and blogger Cliff Schecter initiated this rumor this spring online and then in a book called “The Real McCain.” He wrote that three reporters told him that in response to some teasing, McCain told his wife: “At least I don’t plaster on the makeup like a trollop,” with an expletive. Schecter has not provided any evidence this happened, and he hasn’t identified the three reporters who he says spoke to him on condition of anonymity.

___

The Rumor: Barack Obama isn’t a citizen, suggested bloggers at the Free Republic Web site. Or if he is, he’s hiding his birth certificate for some mysterious reason. Or if he’s shared his birth certificate, it’s a fake because he’s lying about who his real father is. New iterations on this theme pop up almost everyday at various Web sites.

The Facts: Obama plainly is a citizen because he was born in the U.S. In response to the allegations, Obama’s campaign in June posted the Illinois senator’s birth certificate on his campaign Web site, http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate. The nonpartisan Web site Factcheck.org examined the original document and said it does have a raised seal and the usual evidence of a genuine document. On Friday, officials in Hawaii said they had personally verified that the health department holds Obama’s original birth certificate. Judges in Washington state, Ohio and Pennsylvania have dismissed lawsuits challenging his citizenship.

___

The Rumor: Daily Kos Web site, among others, has said Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin’s son Trig, born in April, was actually born to her 17-year-old daughter Bristol.

The Facts: Unsubstantiated. After McCain tapped Palin as his running mate, bloggers accused Palin of faking a pregnancy to cover up for her daughter’s accidental pregnancy. As proof, bloggers said Palin hadn’t appeared pregnant before Trig was born, and that she said she traveled from Texas to Alaska while she was in labor. In an effort to rebut the rumors, the campaign announced that Bristol was, in fact, pregnant. After all, how could Trig be Bristol’s baby if she was pregnant only months later? The announcement slowed the rumors, but didn’t stop the ongoing questions about Trig’s parentage. Even this past week, bloggers were demanding Sarah Palin’s medical records to prove she gave birth to Trig.

____

The Rumor: 1960s radical William Ayers wrote Obama’s autobiography “Dreams From My Father.”

The Facts: Unsubstantiated. Obama says he didn’t meet Ayers until 1995. The book was published in 1995, which means most of it would have been written in 1994. Blogger Jack Cashill has been floating this rumor at the World Net Daily Web site — and it has moved on to many more — hinting that the book’s “fierce, succinct and tightly coiled social analysis” was closer to Ayers’ style than Obama’s. “Utter hogwash,” said Obama organizers. (Yahoo News)

I don’t think this is the ugliest campaign on record. But at this particular moment in this country, it’s unconscionable to attempt to distract us from the serious issues we face by making unsubstantiated claims, many of which have little to do with a candidate’s ability to perform the duties of office. I lose respect for any candidate who spends more time and money trying to demonize their opponent than they do telling us what they will do once elected.

October 12th, 2008

This is how fascism comes: Reflections on the cost of silence

Tim Wise has written a thoughtful and enlightening article in the Red Room that challenges Americans to either take an active stand against the encroaching fascism in our country or reap the rewards of silence.

For those who have seen the ugliness and heard the vitriol emanating from the mouths of persons attending McCain/Palin rallies this past week–what with their demands to kill Barack Obama, slurs that he is a terrorist and a traitor, and paranoid delusions about his crypto-Muslim designs on America–please know this: This is how fascism comes to an ostensible democracy.

Tim Wise

Tim Wise

If it comes–and if those whose poisonous, unhinged verbiage has been so ubiquitous this week have any say over it, it surely will–this is how it will happen: not with tanks and jackbooted storm troopers, but carried in the hearts of men and women dressed in comfortable shoes, with baseball caps, and What Would Jesus Do? wristbands. It will be heralded by up-dos, designer glasses, you-betcha folksiness and a disdain for big words or hard consonants.

If fascism comes, it will spring from the soil of middle America, from people known as values voters but whose values are toxic, from simple folk whose simplicity, far from being admirable, is better labeled ignorance, from “all-American” types whose patriotism is a dagger pointed at the very heart of the national interest, for it so forsakes all the best principles upon which the republic was founded, choosing instead to elevate and ratify the narrow-mindedness, the bigotry, and the intolerance that also marked our country’s origins.

If fascism comes it will be welcomed, lock stock and barrel by persons who pray at every meal to a God they visualize as white, whose son they also think was white, and who they believe is going to rapture them all into the sky upon the blowing of some heavenly trumpet, after which point all those who don’t think as they think will be burned in an eternal lake of fire. Their vision and version of God is itself fascistic–to love a God who would do such a thing is to love an abusive, sadistic and evil deity after all–so it should come as little surprise that their conception of the state would be equally authoritarian or worse.

And if fascism doesn’t come–if, rather, democracy does–it will come because good people said no. It will come because we saw in this moment the opportunity to demand the full measure of our humanity and to pour it forth upon the national soil. It will be because we understood that democracy isn’t what you have, it’s what you do. But if we are to issue that demand, if we are to stand straight and fulfill the potential we possess to do justice, we had best exercise the option quickly, for the opponents of justice are on the move. They are preparing to enter on the winds of our silence and indifference, and complacency. Let them find no quarter here.

Please be sure to read the full article here.

Tim raises points that should be important to any person who truly values our American ideals. He espouses beliefs at the core of humanism and non-belief.

Politics and religion have become the great social dividers. They create a climate of them vs. us, a belief that one group is right and everyone else is wrong. They belittle and push to the margins anyone who advocates cooperation, equality and peace. They attempt to silence those who oppose them.

Those of us who support humanistic goals, who champion equality and fairness, who oppose division, hate and prejudice must make our voices heard. We cannot remain silent and hope for the best. Simply voting for a change and expecting the government to reclaim its Constitutional heritage isn’t going to be enough.

We have to actively oppose racism, bigotry and ignorance whenever we encounter it. We must speak out, silence is not an option.

October 9th, 2008

63 trillion votes so far from Florida alone

Florida voters are overwhelmingly supporting Palin for president. Even dead Floridians are voting for Palin. Vote silly in ‘08!

October 8th, 2008

The Liberal Insult Generator

For all those who proudly call themselves Conservative, who subscribe to any far right position without reason or consideration and who cannot manage on their own to compose a killer comeback to those pesky, commie-loving, homo-supporting, anti-god, anti-troops, anti-American, spineless, sushi-eating, terrorist-coddling, Hollywood-humping, liberal defeatocrats: the internet brings you the The Liberal Insult Generator.

Now your mindless taunts can sound faintly erudite. “Hey, you militant victim-playing defeatocrats, you’re all loony criminal-pampering elitists. You weak, morality-destroying girlie men, you’re nothing but neorotic troop-slandering sodomites! (Feel free to take a moment to Google those words, you’ll find they’re wonderfully nasty)

Isn’t that fun? No more having to actually think up an ass-kicking insult. No need to do any thinking at all. And isn’t that the best part of being a knee-jerk Conservative anyway?

And for all you equally knee-jerk Liberals who mindlessly follow the left-wing agenda without any more thought than your counterparts on the right, I’m sure there’s an equally spiffy insult generator on some website for your mindless enjoyment. If someone knows where, leave the URL in the comments.

After all, everyone knows politics isn’t really about who can do the most good for our country or what policies will produce the most good for the greatest number of our citizens; politics is really about who can sling the most fragrant offal at the opposition.

September 29th, 2008

Atheist & Frethinker’s Forum

Due to misuse by a few recent new “members” of the Frethink Forum, I’ve closed that forum and reopened the Atheist & Frethinker’s Forum. It’s all new and open to all free thinker’s, atheist, agnostics and skeptics. Theists are welcome to join, as long as they understand no religion is sacred or protected from skepticism and challenge there.

In order to keep the forum useful to all its legitimate members, spammers will have their accounts deleted as soon as I receive notice that they’ve joined.

Please join up and start a few discussions. It’s a place to share, question and enlighten.