Archive for May, 2008

May 26th, 2008

We are what we think

Definition of Spirit (from Oxford English Dictionary): a person’s non-physical being, composed of their character and emotions

I keep thinking back to this definition. I keep thinking that if those are what comprise our non-physical beings, it’s not suggesting that there’s a soul or other non-corporeal version of ourselves. Character and emotions are based in instincts we develop as we age, lessons learned from life experiences. They are the sum of our experiences. I have no reason to think that those reactions aren’t due in large part to chemical reactions taking place throughout our bodies coupled with electrical connections being made in the brain.

Our brains are us, we are our brains. Our bodies are nothing more than containers for the innards.  The majority of the truly important parts of us are on the inside.  The outside is just packaging.  We’ve developed the means to keep a body alive artificially through the traumatic or surgical removal of any human organ except the brain. We can keep a person alive by replacing almost every organ and limb except the brain. God didn’t give us everything we experience in this life. Our brains did.

Jack Eber Carlson

May 24th, 2008

Thou shalt not question thy faith

Theism of any stripe is a pernicious threat to thought and enlightenment. It subjugates its followers by making doubt a sin and ignorance an asset. It lives in fear of being exposed to logic and common sense. It attempts to hide from exposure. It creates mysteries to camouflage its shallowness.

Jack Eber Carlson

May 21st, 2008

It’s the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine

The word on the street is that in June the Large Hadron Collider will open a stargate for aliens to invade Earth.

A Stargate? Cool. That’s so much more potentially interesting than most of the other predictions. An alien invasion isn’t necessarily a bad development. It could be a good thing for humanity.

Having said that I have to admit that I enjoy reading science fiction, especially hard sci-fi. I know that the odds favor the possibility that some sort of life exists elsewhere in the galaxy. There’s only one good reason I can think of to not believe in alien life, and I agree with that reason.

There’s no evidence of life existing anywhere else in the universe. There’s evidence that suggests that’s at least possible. But at this point in time there’s nothing that positively supports the notion that life has ever existed anywhere but here on Earth. For that reason, I am free to conclude that it’s equally possible for there to be no life anywhere but here. And I am quite comfortable thinking that. That life exists solely on this one planet accounts for all the evidence we have at the moment regarding life in the known universe, and adds a degree of importance to our lives. Instead of fretting about how “alone” that makes us in the universe, I prefer to focus on and emphasize the fact we have each other, we have us.

That’s why it’s so important to me to stand for peace and harmony, and end to the divisions between people. I would that every human could only perceive other humans as humans, nothing else. No other criteria. If you’re human you’re human. If you’re not human, you’re another species. We are all on this ride together. (We’re also all stearing in billions of different directions.) We are yet too immature a species to have developed a strong inter-species bonding. We focus on the differences rather than the commonalities, to our general discredit.

Doomsday cults and those whose religion takes delight in focusing on the complete (and frequently prayed for soon) distruction of mankind are anti-humans. They dislike their own species. In fact they openly and brazenly declare themselves removed from the rest of humanity. They take egotistic pride, and joy born in ignorance, in the fact that they are not an animal. They have invented a new species based on philosophical beliefs. Homo sapian christianus, Homo sapian muslami, etc. Their philosophical beliefs are responsible, in part, for retarding the advancement of the human race simply because they’re so widespread. Religions and superstitions are holdovers from our not-all-that-distant past, but they’ve become an albatross around the neck of humanity.

If non-believers can have titles like the believers have, then I’d consider myself to be a prophet of atheism. I’m not militant, I don’t usually harangue theists unless invited to do so, but I’d rather focus on the positive effects of ridding oneself from preconceived, mired-in-the-past attitudes. Like it or not, we’re headed into the future. We will never in our lifetimes be able to return to the past, even the last minute. We are irrevocably advancing in time.

I’m also an advocate of basing one’s beliefs as much as possible on what you do know to your personal degree of satisfaction to be reality. I advocate people accepting the future as inevitable and getting their brains wrapped around the idea that what’s past is past and we need to be concerned and involved with our own species’ future.

Otherwise all those dommsayers will get the satisfaction of having their potentially self-fulfilling prophesies come to pass, taking us all with them.

Jack Eber Carlson

May 17th, 2008

Why I Became an Atheist: A Former Preacher Rejects Christianity

For about two decades John W. Loftus was a devout evangelical Christian, an ordained minister of the Church of Christ, and an ardent apologist for Christianity. With three degrees–in philosophy, theology, and philosophy of religion–he was adept at using rational argumentation to defend the faith. But over the years, as he ministered to various congregations and taught at Christian colleges, doubts about the credibility of key Christian tenets began to creep into his thinking. By the late 1990s he experienced a full-blown crisis of faith, brought on by emotional upheavals in his personal life as well as the gathering weight of the doubts he had long entertained.

In this honest appraisal of his journey from believer to atheist, Loftus carefully explains the experiences and the reasoning process that led him to reject religious belief. The bulk of the book is his “cumulative case” against Christianity. Here he lays out the philosophical, scientific, and historical reasons that can be raised against Christian belief. From the implications of religious diversity, the authority of faith vs. reason, and the problem of evil, to the contradictions between the Bible and the scientific worldview, the conflicts between traditional dogma and historical evidence, and much more, Loftus covers a great deal of intellectual terrain. For every issue he succinctly summarizes the various points of view and provides references for further reading. In conclusion, he describes the implications of life without belief in God, some liberating, some sobering.

This frank critique of Christian belief from a former insider will interest freethinkers as well as anyone with doubts about the claims of religion. (Amazon.com)

Another point of view for anyone serious about thinking for themselves.

May 14th, 2008

Prove there is no god

It’s a challenge encountered by non-believers frequently. Believers think that the existence of their god is the default reality. Anyone suggesting otherwise had better explain themselves.

They fail to appreciate that we were all born atheists. To credit their intellectual honesty in at least this case, I’ve never heard a believer even try to say that we are born with an inherent belief in a particular god. They believe the newborn has a relationship with god, but it’s a one-way relationship. God supposedly knows the baby, but there’s no indication the baby is aware of god. So I can conclude that babies are born Tabula Rasa, with no concept of gods.

I’m at a loss to imagine how anyone can present positive proof of a thing’s nonexistence. How could I prove that Superman doesn’t exist, the unicorn, leprechauns? I’m pretty much stuck with if a god behaves the way its followers say it does, then it would have to have left physical evidence, having interacted in a physical way with humans in the past. The lack of evidence and lack of modern day contact would lead to a conclusion that either a god had existed but died, left town, whatever or that it never existed in the first place.

I don’t feel any more inclined to defend my non-belief to believers than I do my nonpartisan position to Dems, Repubs and Libs. I’m not making a positive claim, I’m not asking them to believe anything, not an alternative religion or anything else. All I’m asking them to do is examine their beliefs critically and, if they are to have a faith, have a faith that can withstand rigorous skepticism. I’m asking them to actually think about what they believe. I’m demanding nothing more of them than to use their god given brain. For that I don’t have to prove a thing.

Winning converts to atheism has no purpose. It provides no benefit to other atheists, it offers no reward, it isn’t celebrated. I do like socializing with atheists more than mixed groups or an all-believer group. I am often in mixed and all-believer groups. They don’t scare me and I’m not overly impressed with them. But when I’m around other atheists, just like when I’m around other geeks, other animal lovers (nothing kinky, mind you) or other gays/bi’s, then I’m totally relaxed and find the conversations far more stimulating. Note that every group I consider myself a part of does no proselytizing, doesn’t recruit and firmly believes that one is either born an animal lover, geek, gay and/or atheist (we’re all born atheists) or one is not. And no one is likely to wake up one morning to find themselves magically transformed into one. They’re expressions of our genetic profile. I can’t yet alter the genetic profile of others. That’s why I can’t even think about trying to convert others to atheism.

Theists, on the other hand…

Jack Eber Carlson

May 10th, 2008

Freethought is a better condition for the human sense of natural wonder.

The aim of this thought experiment is to explore the conditions that favour the human sense of natural wonder. This sense is an important part of life quality because it adds intensity to our feelings. Plus it is an important part of our respect of nature and of our responsibility for the environment.

See if you agree…